Skip to content
WeAreForensic
WeAreForensic

A body of evidence…

  • HOME
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Search
WeAreForensic

A body of evidence…

Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 – The end of legal highs?

Posted on May 25, 2016 By Dr Tom Bassindale

Share this…


  • Linkedin



  • Twitter


  • Pinterest

  • Bluesky


  • Facebook


  • Email



  • WordPress

From midnight (starting 26 May 2016) the Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 comes into effect, aiming to stamp out the market in ‘legal highs’ or novel psychoactive substances.

pills

The Act, which has seen several delays this year, will make it an offence to import, sell, supply or produce any substance knowing that it may be used to produce a psychoactive effect.  A psychoactive substance is defined in the Act as being capable of “producing a psychoactive effect in a person who consumes it” if it acts by “stimulating or depressing the person’s central nervous system, affecting the person’s mental functioning or emotional state“. So anything that affects your body or mind can be defined in this way, think alcohol, caffeine, nicotine… All of those three examples are actually expressly listed as exemptions to the Act, along with controlled drugs, medicinal drugs and foodstuffs.  Controlled drugs are those that are already listed in the Misuse of Drugs Act, which is not being changed. Medicinal drugs are those defined by the Human Medicines Regulations 2012. Foodstuffs are defined as anything that is usually used as a food or drink and does not contain a prohibited ingredient (an added drug). Nitrous oxide will fall under this Act when sold for recreational use, but not when sold as a propellant for whipped cream.

According to the Home Office Website the penalties that will be introduced include:

  • up to 7 years in prison for the supply, production, possession with intent to supply, importation or exportation of a psychoactive substance for human consumption
  • up to 2 years in prison for possessing a psychoactive substance in a custodial institution
  • prohibition and premises orders, which will allow police to shut down head shops and online dealers in the UK, with up to 2 years in prison for those who fail to comply
  • police powers to seize and destroy psychoactive substances, search people, premises and vehicles, and to search premises by warrant if necessary

There has been a big rise in ‘legal highs’, more recently defined as novel psychoactive substances (NPS), in the past ten years.  These NPS are drugs designed to mimic illicit drugs but avoid the legal controls. Mostly they are said to be similar to cocaine, ecstasy, amphetamine or cannabis. Most come from a laboratory straight to the high street with very few if any tests on them for safety or effect. There is little or no toxicology data available following tests on either humans or animals. These are generally not produced in the same type of controlled environment as medicinal drugs so the labels may not accurately reflect the contents.

The first legal high I was aware of was benzylpiperazine (BZP), said to give an amphetamine like effect. This was massive in New Zealand when I was there and I wrote about that here.  This was often used combined with another substance, called TFMPP, which produced an ecstasy like effect.  Then there was the development of the synthetic cannabinoids, which have been big news for the last few years. These are said to mimic cannabis, but are actually research chemicals produced in the lab rather than grown. Many of the synthetic cannabinoids are said to be more dangerous than the cannabis they are mimicking, having lead to many reports of hospitalisations and some reported deaths. Since then many have come and gone, being banned as they become popular. It was for this reason the government decided on a blanket approach rather than having to be reactive every time a drug comes onto the market.

What the act will mean for the consumer?  Many shops have been selling off their stocks cheaply to get rid befoer the ban comes into effect. This is fine as the possession for personal use is not an offence. Soon though there will be a big gap in the market where the ‘head shops’ and online shops sold these pills. There are a large number of people who wish to use NPS for recreation, will these people now stick to other legal drugs, caffeine, alcohol and nicotine or will there be a move to other, illegal, drugs? Pro legislation campaigners have said that the use of NPS has caused 400 deaths which wouldn’t have happened but head shop owners have pointed out many more people die each year from abuse of illegal drugs (mainly heroin and cocaine).

It’ll be interesting to see the trend of drug use in the next little while, when regular users have used up all of their stocks!

Thanks for reading – any thoughts on what will happen next?

Share this…


  • Linkedin



  • Twitter


  • Pinterest

  • Bluesky


  • Facebook


  • Email



  • WordPress

Blog Drugs News alcoholcaffeinedrugsforensic sciencelegal highsPolicepolicyresearchtoxicology

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Comments (3)

  1. Steve W says:
    May 25, 2016 at 7:48 pm

    An awful lot of people seem to be taking up baking if the whipped cream canister reviews on Amazon are to be believed. All of course due to the GBBO, not the PSA 2016 I’m sure!

    Reply
  2. Steve W says:
    May 25, 2016 at 7:50 pm

    An awful lot of people seem to be taking up baking, if the whipped cream canister supplier reviews on Amazon are to be believed. Entirely due to the GBBO and not the PSA 2016 I’m sure!

    Reply
    1. Avatar photo Dr Tom Bassindale says:
      May 26, 2016 at 6:37 am

      Haha, yes I’m sure it’s legitimate baking inspired by Mary Berry!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


9 + = 18


Sign up for updates here...


 

Tweets

Tom Bassindale Follow

Dr Tom Bassindale. #Forensic #toxicologist, #antidoping scientist. Head of School of Biosciences and Chemistry at Sheffield Hallam Uni.

WeAreForensic
weareforensic Tom Bassindale @weareforensic ·
19 Nov

The Chain - book review - what did Wiggins have to say about doping?
https://open.substack.com/pub/weareforensic/p/the-chain-book-review?r=332duj&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

Reply on Twitter 1991077170047832165 Retweet on Twitter 1991077170047832165 Like on Twitter 1991077170047832165 Twitter 1991077170047832165
weareforensic Tom Bassindale @weareforensic ·
18 Nov

How THG Evaded Detection: A Dive into Steroid Chemistry http://www.weareforensic.co.uk/how-thg-evaded-detection-a-dive-into-steroid-chemistry/

Reply on Twitter 1990823141052944794 Retweet on Twitter 1990823141052944794 2 Like on Twitter 1990823141052944794 4 Twitter 1990823141052944794
weareforensic Tom Bassindale @weareforensic ·
14 Nov

How THG Evaded Detection: A Dive into Steroid Chemistry http://www.weareforensic.co.uk/how-thg-evaded-detection-a-dive-into-steroid-chemistry/

Reply on Twitter 1989306407947051249 Retweet on Twitter 1989306407947051249 Like on Twitter 1989306407947051249 Twitter 1989306407947051249
weareforensic Tom Bassindale @weareforensic ·
14 Nov

The Chain - book review https://open.substack.com/pub/weareforensic/p/the-chain-book-review?r=332duj&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

Reply on Twitter 1989298235731558461 Retweet on Twitter 1989298235731558461 Like on Twitter 1989298235731558461 Twitter 1989298235731558461
weareforensic Tom Bassindale @weareforensic ·
28 Oct

Enhanced Games – “Are You Not Entertained?” http://www.weareforensic.co.uk/enhanced-games-are-you-not-entertained/

Reply on Twitter 1983129083727777851 Retweet on Twitter 1983129083727777851 Like on Twitter 1983129083727777851 Twitter 1983129083727777851
Load More

Recent posts…

©2026 WeAreForensic | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes